User talk:King of Hearts
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Siebrand 21:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello blocking admin[edit]
Hello blocking admin. I saw that you've been using the block button. I just came to let you know that I am a Roman Catholic who reads the newspapers. I pay bills.-Newspaper reader pays bills (talk) 05:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
I apologize[edit]
I misunderstood the purpose of {{Udelh}}. Are we good? --Trade (talk) 22:07, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Queen Mary’s doll house[edit]
Please undelete:
- File:Parian ware model of Queen Mary’s doll house.jpg
- File:Parian ware model of Queen Mary’s doll house (back).jpg
- File:Parian ware model of Queen Mary’s doll house (stamp).jpg
- File:Parian ware model of Queen Mary’s doll house (retouched).jpg
the files are not copyright violations, and were uploaded by the Etsy seller after I sent a request to do so via their Etsy store. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:42, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing: Done and tagged with {{OTRS pending}}. As the images have been previously published on an external website, we need one of the following: 1) the Etsy website updated to show the CC license; 2) the Etsy seller sends an email to COM:VRT confirming that Scarlett3561 belongs to them; or 3) the Etsy seller sends an email containing a CC release. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lithia Park Ashland November 2019 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lithia Park Ashland November 2019 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --XRay 19:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lithia Park Ashland November 2019 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Discussion at Com:VPC#File:2020 Bols Blue.jpg[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Com:VPC#File:2020 Bols Blue.jpg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hi King of Hearts. Would you mind taking a peek at this? -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Common May 2018 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Common May 2018 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Common May 2018 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Common May 2018 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lithia Park Ashland November 2019 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lithia Park Ashland November 2019 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality --Llez 05:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lithia Park Ashland November 2019 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality --Llez 05:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lithia Park Ashland November 2019 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lithia Park Ashland November 2019 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lithia Park Ashland November 2019 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
You are invited to comment on a subject at "COM:VP/C"[edit]
As you took part in the previous discussion surrounding this template, I would like to invite you to the current discussion about the template "PD-South VietnamGov" as editors over at the Vietnamese-language Wikisource have been debating its validity and seek help from users who have more experience in dealing with these kinds of copyright © disputes. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Public Garden May 2018 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --XRay 02:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Public Garden May 2018 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --XRay 02:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Public Garden May 2018 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --XRay 02:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Public Garden May 2018 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --XRay 02:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lithia Park Ashland November 2019 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Public Garden May 2018 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 7 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Public Garden May 2018 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Public Garden May 2018 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Public Garden May 2018 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Public Garden May 2018 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Public Garden May 2018 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:59, 8 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Newbury Street Boston May 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boston Public Garden May 2018 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States 2021[edit]
Hello! Last year you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in the United States. Thanks to people like you, it was a great success with over 1,000 people contributing almost 6,000 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage. If you haven't seen the winners yet, be sure to check them out here.
I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in the United States through the month of October, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information.
Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 21:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2019102210000851[edit]
Hi! Can you please take a look at Ticket:2019102210000851? There are 2 PDF in ja- and I've got doubts about the validity of the statement. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 10:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- The statement is not valid because 1) it is of limited duration; and 2) it is restricted to websites. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:53, 15 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:54, 15 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:54, 15 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:57, 15 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 15 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 15 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Simiot clarinette 9 clefs - Palais Lascaris.jpg[edit]
Hello, May you explain me why you deleted the picture of a Simiot's 9key clariney without explanation?
This picture is coming from Europeana base with CC licence: As required by Europeana site, I joined their proposed comments:
« Clarinette en si b par Simiot - Musée du Palais Lascaris (Nice), Europe - CC BY-NC-SA.
https://www.europeana.eu/fr/item/09102/_CM_0840349 »
What is wrong ? I propose that you restore this picture in commons wikimedia for the community.
BR, Clarioio (talk) 21:21, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- CC BY-NC-SA is not accepted on Commons, see Commons:Licensing/Justifications for why. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:46, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Ok, I did a mistake.
Clarioio (talk) 22:05, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Review a VRT ticket[edit]
Hello @King of Hearts
Hope you're having a good day today
Actually there is a discussion going on Commons:UDR on the file of File:Statue of Gurjar Samraat Mihir Bhoj Mahaan in Bharat Upvan ofAkshardham Mandir New Delhi.jpg. Can you please help us on providing the information of this ticket like in which license it was accepted and so on, so it will be more clearer. Many thanks, Contributers2020Talk to me here 03:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marshfield Pond October 2021 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marshfield Pond October 2021 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Support Good quality. --Halavar 17:43, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[]